Privacy Law Library

Security of Communications Act

OK SCA (wiretap)

Communications

Oklahoma's wiretap law makes it a felony to willfully intercept wire, oral, or electronic communications, or to disclose or use their contents knowing they were unlawfully obtained. Oklahoma is a one-party consent state: a private person may record a communication they are a party to, or with one party's prior consent, unless the purpose is to commit a crime. The act also governs court-ordered interception by law enforcement.

Where
Oklahoma
Citation
13 O.S. §§ 176.1-176.14
Status
In force
Last amended
2026-01-01
Enforced by
District attorneys and the Attorney General (criminal prosecution); courts for interception orders
People can sue
No
Penalties
Unlawful interception, disclosure, or use is a Class D1 felony punishable by a fine of at least $5,000, imprisonment, or both; interception devices may be seized and forfeited. Unlawfully intercepted communications are inadmissible as evidence.
Applies to
  • Any person who intercepts, discloses, or uses wire, oral, or electronic communications
  • Communication common carriers and their employees
  • Manufacturers, sellers, and possessors of interception devices

Practices it requires

  • Do not willfully intercept, or procure another to intercept, any wire, oral, or electronic communication, or use a device to intercept an oral communication.13 O.S. § 176.3(1)-(2)
  • Do not disclose or use the contents of a communication knowing or having reason to know it was obtained in violation of the act.13 O.S. § 176.3(3)-(4)
  • Do not mail, carry, manufacture, assemble, possess, or sell devices intended to be primarily useful for illegal interception.13 O.S. § 176.3(6)-(7)
  • Communication common carriers may intercept only as a necessary incident of service or to protect their rights or property and may not use service observing or random monitoring except for mechanical or service quality control checks.13 O.S. § 176.4(1)

Other duties

  • One-party consent: a person not acting under color of law may intercept a communication if a party to it or with one party's prior consent, unless intercepted to commit a crime.13 O.S. § 176.4(5)
  • Law enforcement interception requires a court order under the act's application, sealing, inventory, and reporting procedures; evidence obtained in violation is suppressible.13 O.S. §§ 176.6-176.13

Sources

Checked against these sources on 2026-09-25 by research agent (Claude), primary sources.

Unverified: effective_date left null: the act was added by Laws 1982, c. 343, and the compiled statute gives no effective date. | The Legislature's Title 13 PDF is compiled through the 2025 session; 2026 session amendments, if any, were not checked section by section (OSCN began returning a bot-verification page during research).

Research reference, not legal advice.