Privacy Law Library

Unlawful dissemination of intimate images, including realistic digitally created depictions

ORS 163.472; 30.833

Artificial intelligence · Other

Oregon's nonconsensual intimate image law makes it a crime, and a civil wrong, to share someone's intimate images to harass, humiliate or injure them. HB 2299 (2025) extended it from January 1, 2026 to realistic AI-generated or digitally altered 'deepfake' images.

Where
Oregon
Citation
ORS 163.472; ORS 30.833; ORS 30.834
Status
In force
Last amended
2026-01-01
Enforced by
District attorneys (criminal); private civil actions (ORS 30.833, 30.834)
People can sue
Yes
Penalties
Class A misdemeanor; Class C felony with a prior conviction (ORS 163.472(2)). Civil action for the greater of actual damages or $5,000 statutory damages per defendant, plus disgorgement, punitive damages and attorney fees (ORS 30.833). Separate civil action for unsolicited electronic transmission of intimate images: greater of damages up to $10,000 or $500 (ORS 30.834).
Applies to
  • Any person who knowingly discloses an intimate image of another with intent to harass, humiliate or injure, knowing the person did not consent; since 2026-01-01 this includes reasonably realistic digitally created, manipulated or altered depictions (ORS 163.472(3)(b)(B), HB 2299)
  • Excludes interactive computer service providers for third-party content (ORS 163.472(4)(g))

Practices it requires

  • Do not disclose an intimate image of another person without consent with intent to harass, humiliate or injure.ORS 163.472(1)
  • The prohibition covers reasonably realistic digitally created, manipulated or altered depictions.ORS 163.472(3)(b)(B) · From 2026-01-01
  • Adults may not send unsolicited intimate images electronically to harass, degrade or humiliate the recipient.ORS 30.834(2)

Sources

Checked against these sources on 2026-09-25 by research agent (Claude), primary sources.

Unverified: Original effective date (2015 c.379) not fetched.

Research reference, not legal advice.